| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | A different question, on SGI's STP for Linux |
| From: | Jonathan Day <imipak@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 May 2005 21:47:14 -0700 (PDT) |
| Comment: | DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=gWWoKT5xL8mtEwptkpBcbz5JWWm7/T+v11M7glDzAb+YQOrEyTMTcgu9ncQYsW7GgNCJN+fW1BlRiXZhS4ELr+9O2Dfmlc/ybbXVPRPMCPPcdHtMvb8lYFujT8h0vtquo8M/KYlR1Vuv5Idojc1DjUK9ECQhHWKCMV1hIRz2Et0= ; |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi,
Another quick question, chasing the ones on QoS. At
one point, SGI had an intriguing prototype
implementation of something called the "Scheduled
Transfer Protocol" for Linux. Sadly, this project
seems to have vanished into the mists. I -think- I
have a copy, somewhere, that I downloaded from the
Open Source projects site.
I presume, from the fact that nobody else seems to
have picked it up, that STP isn't as useful as it
sounds. Is it something that would be worth
forward-porting to a recent kernel, or is it more of a
dead-end approach that can be done as well by other
means?
Jonathan
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Questions wrt QoS code on Linux, Jonathan Day |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | issue with new TCP TSO stuff, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Questions wrt QoS code on Linux, Jonathan Day |
| Next by Thread: | issue with new TCP TSO stuff, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |