| To: | Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPsec performance over UDP |
| From: | Michael Iatrou <m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 May 2005 23:35:19 +0300 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42810057.4020800@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <200505101949.12236.m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> <42810057.4020800@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.8 |
When the date was Tuesday 10 May 2005 21:41, Rick Jones wrote: > > The "unexpected" result is that there is 30% idle time even if the > > network is not saturated! > > Perhaps the sending side got intra-stack flow-controlled? In that case, plain IP should't also have the same problem (it hasn't)? -- Michael Iatrou Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. University of Patras, Greece |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: tg3 support broken on PPC, a workaround, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tg3 support broken on PPC, a workaround, Michael Chan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance over UDP, Rick Jones |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: PHY Abstraction Layer II, Andy Fleming |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |