| To: | Michael Iatrou <m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPsec performance over UDP |
| From: | Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 May 2005 11:41:27 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200505101949.12236.m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200505101949.12236.m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; HP-UX 9000/785; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304 |
Michael Iatrou wrote: Hi,I did some testing for IPsec performance over UDP. I used two identical PCs, connected back-to-back, with Intel Xeon 2.8GHz (SMP/SMT disabled), 512MB RAM, e1000 (82546EB), running Linux 2.6.11.7. I tested AES {128,192,256}, DES, 3DES, SHA, MD5 and various combinations of them for ESP and AH.Network performance: http://members.hellug.gr/iatrou/udp-throughput.png CPU utilization: http://members.hellug.gr/iatrou/udp-cpu.pngThe "unexpected" result is that there is 30% idle time even if the network is not saturated! Perhaps the sending side got intra-stack flow-controlled? rick jones |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next., Evgeniy Polyakov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tg3 support broken on PPC, a workaround, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | IPsec performance over UDP, Michael Iatrou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance over UDP, Michael Iatrou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |