| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: resend patch: xfrm policybyid |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 05 May 2005 22:20:16 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1115345403.7660.49.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <1115298877.7680.75.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050505213239.GA29526@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115331436.8006.112.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050505231210.GA30574@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115342122.7660.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050506013125.GA31780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115345403.7660.49.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 22:10 -0400, jamal wrote: > > Look at these as array subscripts if you want an analogy. You can > reference an empty array slot but not one thats being used. If you dont > specify the array index then the kernel will provide one for you. It wasnt clear - but the above description is for adding. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: resend patch: xfrm policybyid, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC ethtool usage, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: resend patch: xfrm policybyid, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: resend patch: xfrm policybyid, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |