[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patch: Action repeat

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 09:06:39 -0400
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050504145341.GG18452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: unknown
References: <20050502150632.GM577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115207194.7665.109.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050504123157.GA18452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115211549.7665.140.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050504132822.GB18452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115213600.7665.166.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050504134815.GD18452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115214782.7665.184.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050504140540.GE18452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115216629.7906.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050504145341.GG18452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2005-04-05 at 16:53 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * jamal <1115216629.7906.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 10:23

> > Agreed. So shall we stick then to just make it a global-only?
> As long as we can't find a way to have a well defined local
> scope which is both easy to implement and easy to understand
> for the user a global-only scope with the ability for the user
> to reset the value via the meta action is most reasonable to me.

ok - i will wait to see the patches from Patrick out first then do this.
Its actually a simple change.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>