| To: | Andrew Grover <andy.grover@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add more explanation to tcp_prequeue comment |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 May 2005 14:30:46 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <c0a09e5c05042814145901639e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <c0a09e5c05042814145901639e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:14:13 -0700 Andrew Grover <andy.grover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Here's a patch to make that prequeue comment a little clearer. Look ok? Looks great, except that it does not apply cleanly. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mystery packet killing tg3, Michael Chan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] cleanups in drivers/net/wan/ - kfree of NULL pointer is valid, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] [RTNETLINK] Cleanup rtnetlink_link tables, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] cleanups in drivers/net/wan/ - kfree of NULL pointer is valid, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |