| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPsec performance |
| From: | Miika Komu <miika@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 May 2005 08:25:15 +0300 (EEST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505030248020.26815@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022117190.25766@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022204090.25766@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505030248020.26815@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Patrick McHardy wrote: > On Mon, 2 May 2005, Miika Komu wrote: > >> I compared TCP-over-NULL-ESP vs. plain-TCP throughput with "ttcp" tool and > >> obtained the following results: > >> > >> Plain-TCP: 11 megabytes/s > >> NULL-ESP: 2.5 megabytes/s > >> > > I browsed the archives also and found this one: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00801.html > > null encryption uses a block size of 1, which causes inefficent handling > of the data. I'm unsure if some hack for this specific case is worth it > since its only meant for testing. Thanks for your response. However, this does explain why I got only 1.9 megabytes/s with 3DES. -- Miika Komu miika@xxxxxx http://www.iki.fi/miika/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mystery packet killing tg3, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPsec performance, Dave Dillow |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance, Dave Dillow |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |