netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] resource release cleanup in net/

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] resource release cleanup in net/
From: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 01:21:50 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pedro Roque <roque@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kunihiro Ishiguro <kunihiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mitsuru KANDA <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lksctp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxx>, Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxx>, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050501230843.GA16518@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504302219520.2094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050501230843.GA16518@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Herbert Xu wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:36:00PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > 
> > Since Andrew merged the patch that makes calling crypto_free_tfm() with a 
> > NULL pointer safe into 2.6.12-rc3-mm1, I made a patch to remove checks for 
> > NULL before calling that function, and while I was at it I removed similar 
> > redundant checks before calls to kfree() and vfree() in the same files. 
> > There are also a few tiny whitespace cleanups in there.
> 
> Hi Jesper:
> 
> Could we wait until the crypto_free_tfm patch gets into the main tree?
> Most people here track that instead of mm.
> 

Sure. I don't have a problem with that.

I'll just hold on to the patches and resend them at a later date.


-- 
Jesper 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>