netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 12:00:41 -0400
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050528121827.GQ15391@postel.suug.ch>
Organization: unknown
References: <20050527125010.GO15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117202331.6383.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527141320.GQ15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527151913.GA15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117209466.6383.106.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527165935.GC15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117242749.6251.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050528012810.GN15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117244893.6251.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050528121827.GQ15391@postel.suug.ch>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 2005-28-05 at 14:18 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:

> I wanted to have some time for testing today without the need
> to resubmit the patches. ;->
> 

fair enough ;->

> I just tested both patches for about 30 minutes. Everything OK. Feel
> free to apply the patches.

We have another problem. What tree is this against? Both patches have
failures patching against latest davem and linus git trees.

I am kind of distracted right now but I could fix this later.

cheers,
jamal 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>