netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patch: Action repeat

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 08:59:08 -0400
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch>
Organization: unknown
References: <4273CAB7.6080403@trash.net> <1114890709.8929.147.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430200848.GF577@postel.suug.ch> <1114894202.8929.165.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430215550.GH577@postel.suug.ch> <1114900485.8929.171.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430235809.GI577@postel.suug.ch> <1115035838.8929.236.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050502150632.GM577@postel.suug.ch> <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2005-04-05 at 14:31 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * jamal <1115207194.7665.109.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 07:46

> > tc_verd to say "clear tc_classid" and have the meta action decide if it
> > is global(dont clear) or not(clear - current behavior) during
> > clone/copy . Does this sound reasonable?
> 
> I have no objections but fail to see why we want to clear it anyway?
> 

If its scope is local i.e for one device, then not reseting could
confuse the next device that sees it and tries to classify on it.

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>