[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patch: Action repeat

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 08:59:08 -0400
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: unknown
References: <> <1114890709.8929.147.camel@localhost.localdomain> <> <1114894202.8929.165.camel@localhost.localdomain> <> <1114900485.8929.171.camel@localhost.localdomain> <> <1115035838.8929.236.camel@localhost.localdomain> <> <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> <>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2005-04-05 at 14:31 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * jamal <1115207194.7665.109.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 07:46

> > tc_verd to say "clear tc_classid" and have the meta action decide if it
> > is global(dont clear) or not(clear - current behavior) during
> > clone/copy . Does this sound reasonable?
> I have no objections but fail to see why we want to clear it anyway?

If its scope is local i.e for one device, then not reseting could
confuse the next device that sees it and tries to classify on it.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>