netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [RESEND][PATCH net-drivers-2.6 0/16] e1000: driver update

To: "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [RESEND][PATCH net-drivers-2.6 0/16] e1000: driver update
From: "Chilakala, Mallikarjuna" <mallikarjuna.chilakala@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:51:30 -0700
Cc: "netdev" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcVMZNFw35T64xAnQg277UXL/nYANAAAL63A
Thread-topic: [RESEND][PATCH net-drivers-2.6 0/16] e1000: driver update
Unfortunately, all the patches seem to have been mangled when I had
RESEND them yesterday. Not sure if my mailer did it, but it sure made
them harder to handle.

People monitoring on the netdev list are having problems,

So I'm resending them with proper text server like PINE

Please bare with me
-Malli

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:40 PM
To: Chilakala, Mallikarjuna
Cc: netdev
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH net-drivers-2.6 0/16] e1000: driver update

On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:38:17PM -0700, Malli Chilakala wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mallikarjuna R Chilakala
<mallikarjuna.chilakala@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Venkatesan <ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx>

Unless you've changed anything, there's no need to resend these.  I've
got them all in my inbox.  Just plodding very slow ATM as I figure out
how to best represent the 40+ branches of netdev-2.6 inside a git
repository.  :)

        Jeff





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>