| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about QOS |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:14:44 -0700 |
| Cc: | nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050427114216.GV577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <426E06F1.9000105@xxxxxxxxx> <20050426125955.GT577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <426E56DC.7000108@xxxxxxxxx> <20050426191454.GU577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <426F42F0.9020609@xxxxxxxxx> <20050427114216.GV577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:42:16 +0200 Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > * Nicolas DICHTEL <426F42F0.9020609@xxxxxxxxx> 2005-04-27 09:44 > > > > >Yes I agree, it doesn't really matter what value we return and `bound' > > >is most likely to be correct. I think we should also fix the unlikely > > >but still possible case when tv1.tv_usec is slightly smaller than > > >tv2.tv_usec. I know it is very unlikely but do_gettimeofday really > > >is not that reliable and we have users which rely on a positive > > >delta. Can you extend your patch to return abs(delta) for case 0 > > >in PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE? > > > > > You're right. Here is the new patch. > > > > [SCHED] Fix range in PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE to 0..bound > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> Applied, thanks everyone. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Incorrect permissions on route flush sysctl, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.6.11 PATCH] /proc/net/stat/* cleanup, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question about QOS, Nicolas DICHTEL |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about QOS, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |