| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch2: del/get byid |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:55:32 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050428024253.GA23695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <1114654284.7663.50.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050428021426.GA23415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114655014.7663.61.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050428022549.GA23556@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114655980.7663.76.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050428024253.GA23695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2005-28-04 at 12:42 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:39:40PM -0400, jamal wrote: > > > > That would never work without those two patches. > > Sorry, but you've just broken the policy timer. This is the > other use of index. It's a sneaky way of carrying around dir > in the policy without actually specifying it :) Dang ;-> Thats some abuse ;-> It would probably be easy to steal 2 bits off the flags instead, no? Its not like they are being highly utilized. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch: policy update by id, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch: policy update by id, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch2: del/get byid, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch2: del/get byid, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |