| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch: policy update by id |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:48:18 +1000 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1114652680.7663.31.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1114602874.7670.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114604657.7670.22.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114604826.7670.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050427233924.GA22238@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114650816.7663.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050428012135.GA22950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114652680.7663.31.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:44:40PM -0400, jamal wrote: > > > I see. In that case you want to change your expression above > > so that the memcmp is never done if excl is off and the index > > is non-zero. > > Hrm. Thinking... So you want to exclude the selector check if someone > updating ever specified the index? That may change things a little, no? > Give me a clever expression. Please see my last email. To do index updates correctly we'll need to modify the current code so that it is able to delete two existing policies. We may have two existing policies if one matches the index while the other matches the selector. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch: policy update by id, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch: policy update by id, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch: policy update by id, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch: policy update by id, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |