netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.

To: johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:20:08 -0500
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guillaume Thouvenin <guillaume.thouvenin@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Jay Lan <jlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=G/EcQb+mEW3M1rHFiiM31e1Btl30beC0s4Hqiv48zGUehE5m3fkqqZrfqDbbAnDPnEGDqrZHToyrBcO3OSi8MDxVK8jtIQkWShYwsoWQaY1oHhXejXFbhEN0yIBkpd69wsFUogSjOaII3ASzc+neIzA0fHLdQXN6cNdPARoI3Uc=
In-reply-to: <20050426220713.7915e036@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050411125932.GA19538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <d120d5000504260857cb5f99e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050426202437.234e7d45@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050426203023.378e4831@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <d120d50005042610342368cd72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050426220713.7915e036@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: dtor_core@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 4/26/05, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, I found it too.
> Following patch should be the solution:
> 
> --- orig/drivers/connector/connector.c
> +++ mod/drivers/connector/connector.c
> @@ -146,13 +146,16 @@
>        spin_lock_bh(&dev->cbdev->queue_lock);
>        list_for_each_entry(__cbq, &dev->cbdev->queue_list, callback_entry) {
>                if (cn_cb_equal(&__cbq->cb->id, &msg->id)) {
> -                       __cbq->cb->priv = msg;
> +
> +                       if (!test_bit(0, &work->pending)) {
> +                               __cbq->cb->priv = msg;
> 
> -                       __cbq->ddata = data;
> -                       __cbq->destruct_data = destruct_data;
> +                               __cbq->ddata = data;
> +                               __cbq->destruct_data = destruct_data;
> 

Still not good enough - work->pending bit gets cleared when work has
been scheduled, but before executing payload. You still have the race.

-- 
Dmitry


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>