| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IPSEC]: Kill nested read lock by deleting xfrm_init_tempsel |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:13:31 -0700 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42683D07.6090808@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050328233917.GB15369@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424B40C2.90304@xxxxxxxxx> <20050331004658.GA26395@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050331212325.5e996432.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050402004956.GA24339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050401172007.7296eced.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050402020947.GA24998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42501E51.3000401@xxxxxxxxx> <20050405103918.GA24863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4252EEA2.5020107@xxxxxxxxx> <20050406022155.GA12952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050421163526.7a29a76f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42683D07.6090808@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:53:43 +0200 Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, tmpl->id.daddr might be 0, in which case the destination > of the packet or previous tunnel mode transforms is used. daddr > always contains the correct adress, so we should use it to check > for duplicate SPIs. But as Herbert noted, we shouldn't perform > the check if tmpl->id.spi == 0, so here is a new patch. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> Ok, that makes sense. Patch applied, thanks guys. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC INTRO 0/5] H-TCP congestion control, Jamie Lokier |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Mailing lists, homepage for orinoco driver, David Gibson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [IPSEC]: Kill nested read lock by deleting xfrm_init_tempsel, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | IPSEC: on behavior of acquire, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |