| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Problem with IPSEC tunnel mode |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Apr 2005 02:13:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050421235802.GB10451@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1DObFc-0000je-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200504211640.16742.wolfgang.walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050421214618.GA29991@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114127419.10572.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050421235802.GB10451@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050324 Debian/1.7.6-1 |
Herbert Xu wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 07:50:19PM -0400, jamal wrote:What was the reason there exist a FWD direction in the policies?You should really ask Alexey about that :) I myself had the same question when I first started in this area. However, since it has been present since the very beginning and people are already relying on it, we will have to live with it. I guess it was for performance reasons. A router that only needs IPsec for management doesn't need to perform policy checks for forwarded packets, which makes sense too me. Regards Patrick |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc2 9/10] tg3: check TG3_FLG2_5750_PLUS flag to set TG3_FLG2_5705_PLUS flag, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problem with IPSEC tunnel mode, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problem with IPSEC tunnel mode, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problem with IPSEC tunnel mode, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |