| To: | Park Lee <parklee_sel@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Must every packet have a creating socket? (was Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?) |
| From: | Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:20:04 -0700 |
| Cc: | Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050420172944.69275.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050420172944.69275.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; HP-UX 9000/785; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304 |
Can I think that every packet (e.g. IP packet) must have a corresponding creating socket? (i.e. Must everypacket be created by a socket?) No. ICMP messages come to mind - although I _suppose_ that since those are in response to other traffic, you could claim it was in response to something sent from a "socket" or "endpoint" - depends on how far away you consider it to still be from a socket. Is there any other way to originate a packet? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH net-drivers-2.6 5/6] e100: Performance optimizations to e100 Tx Path, Malli Chilakala |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk |
| Previous by Thread: | Must every packet have a creating socket? (was Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?), Park Lee |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Must every packet have a creating socket?, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |