Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups

netdev

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups

To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:39:28 +0100
Cc:	mlindner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rroesler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20050420021526.GB5489@xxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>, mlindner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rroesler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References:	<20050420021526.GB5489@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 04:15:26AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
> - make needlessly global functions static
> - remove unused code

Not sure it's worth doing much on this, as the driver is beeing
obsoleted by the skge driver.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups, Christoph Hellwig <= Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk

Previous by Date:	Must every packet have a creating socket? (was Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?), Park Lee
Next by Date:	Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk
Previous by Thread:	[2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk
Next by Thread:	Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]