| To: | Park Lee <parklee_sel@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it? |
| From: | Masoud Sharbiani <masouds@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:06:15 -0400 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050418140348.33642.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050418140348.33642.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | masouds@xxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 07:03 -0700, Park Lee wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 at 08:03, jamal wrote: > > simple answer: no > > Thank you very much. > > Still, Does a forwarded packet also have no any kernel > socket with it? i.e. Is a forwarded packet not > associated with any socket at all? > No. > When the forwarded packet arrived at its destination > machine, is there any socket associated with the > packet on the destination machine? It better be :-) Otherwise, it could be ignored or just refused (as in connection refused). > > Thanks again. > > Best Regards, > Park Lee > > > cheers, Masoud -- Masoud Sharbiani <masouds at masoud.ir> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] QoS: frg queue (was [RFC] QoS: new per flow queue), Wang Jian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?, Neil Horman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?, Park Lee |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?, Neil Horman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |