netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ACPI/HT or Packet Scheduler BUG?

To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ACPI/HT or Packet Scheduler BUG?
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:37:33 +1000
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tarhon-Onu Victor <mituc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, devik@xxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4262A0E8.9020905@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504121526550.4822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504141840420.13546@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1113601029.4294.80.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1113601446.17859.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1113602052.4294.89.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050415225422.GF4114@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050416014906.GA3291@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050416110639.GI4114@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050416111236.GA31550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4262A0E8.9020905@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 07:46:16PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
> HTB also needs to be fixed. Destruction is usually defered by the
> refcnt until ->put(), htb_put() doesn't lock the tree. Same for
> HFSC and CBQ.

Yes you're absolutely right.
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>