Re: [5/*] [IPSEC] Use XFRM_MSG_* instead of XFRM_SAP_*

[jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 04:17, Masahide NAKAMURA wrote:

> short report:
> My testing is not completed but, I've tested below and it is fine:
>  add/del/flush SP and their notifications through netlink (using modified 
> iproute2/ip).
> 
>  new "xfrm_userpolicy_delete" works fine on this case;
>  used byid=1 when deleting SP with specifying SP index.
> 
> I'll test the rest case (17 hours later):
> - using pfkey
> - using both sockets
> 

I did basic testing with pfkey generated events (policy/state) showing
up in both. The vice-versa also looks good.
Herbert, try to push forward to Dave.

cheers,
jamal