[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [2/4] [IPSEC] Kill spurious hard expire messages

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2/4] [IPSEC] Kill spurious hard expire messages
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Apr 2005 10:10:44 -0400
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050409200306.GA9660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1112702604.1089.119.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050409105452.GA7171@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050409111244.GB7171@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1113049844.1090.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050409192926.GA9423@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050409200306.GA9660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 16:03, Herbert Xu wrote:

> xfrm_policy_kill can only be called by the one who removed the
> policy from the linked list.  Therefore it can never fail.
> If this logic is wrong we will be getting fat warnings from
> xfrm_policy_kill.

The warning will kick in but it may be as rare as the issue of a delete
and expire happening on the same policy that your patch was supposed to
stop ;->


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>