[Top] [All Lists]

[6/*] [IPSEC] Add xfrm_userpolicy_delete for xfrm_user notification

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [6/*] [IPSEC] Add xfrm_userpolicy_delete for xfrm_user notification
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 19:38:37 +1000
Cc: Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050410090250.GA26022@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1112702604.1089.119.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050409105452.GA7171@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050409111244.GB7171@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050409111551.GA7378@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050410074849.GA13259@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050410090250.GA26022@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

This patch changes the format of the XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY notification
so that we don't lose the byid information carried in km_event.

Since this user interface is introduced by Jamal's patch we can still
afford to change it.

I know that this is a bit trivial but as it is the information carried
in xfrm_user's notifications is a strict superset of that of af_key
and I'd like to keep it that way :)
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

Attachment: xfrm-event-6
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>