| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] RTNETLINK: Protocol family wildcard dumping for routing rules |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 07 Apr 2005 21:11:22 -0400 |
| Cc: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050408010406.GZ26731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20050407213838.GW26731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1DJfBR-0007Ym-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050407223847.GX26731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112915616.1089.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050407232427.GY26731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112921300.1088.54.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050408010406.GZ26731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 21:04, Thomas Graf wrote: > ... this may include rule systems that do not depend on > CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES, e.g. IPv6 is likely to get an own config option > for this. Or someday we might have DECnet rules? I don't know. > Ok, fair enough. BTW Decnet already has it for family PF_DECnet ;-> [I dont think there has existed a decnet as sophisticated as the one we have - too bad its not used that much]. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] RTNETLINK: Protocol family wildcard dumping for routing rules, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pktgen problem (skb refcount) in 2.6.12-rc1, Ayyappan Veeraiyan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] RTNETLINK: Protocol family wildcard dumping for routing rules, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface..., Radheka Godse |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |