[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff

To: Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:31:21 -0700
Cc: shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42557895.8040004@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050407164146.GA6479@xxxxxxxxx> <20050407101653.2cc68db1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42557895.8040004@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:14:45 +0100
Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Going back to the pre-westwood code in BK, the /2 is still there.
> This wasn't there in 2.4.23 on which on the original work of H-TCP was 
> done.

Not true, that division by 2 is in the 2.4.23 sources, I just

It is there as far back as BK logs go in both the 2.4.x and 2.6.x

Perhaps the WEB100 guys patched that test, I bet that's why you don't
remember it being in 2.4.23

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>