On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:26:18AM -0700, Veeraiyan, Ayyappan wrote:
> Harald,
>
> >
> > As for e1000 and or generic TX path changes, I don't have the time to
> > review them now, sorry :( That's why I posted it to netdev, to let
> > people who have an idea about the committed changes know that there is
> > an issue.
> >
>
> What version of e1000 you are using?
as indicated before, I've observed the problem in 2.6.12-rc1. No
modifications to e1000. So whatever is in 2.6.12-rc1, that's what
showed the problems.
> If you are using e1000 5.7.6-k2 and haven't tried older versions, Could
> you please try e1000 version 5.6.10.1-k2 (available in kernel 2.6.11)
> and inform us the result?
I have tried a 2.6.11 kernel which works fine. I have not tested
patching e1000 in 2.6.12-rc1 to go back to whatever was shipped in
2.6.11.
I'll try to remember testing that once I'm back from my current business
trip (friday), though
> Thanks,
> Ayyappan V.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support it your lifetime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|