Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user

netdev

Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy()

To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy()
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:47:44 +0200 (CEST)
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<20050404012040.GA16960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<4250160D.2040405@xxxxxxxxx> <20050404012040.GA16960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Herbert Xu wrote:

We want the same thing for km_query, no?


In all other places were BHs are not explicitly disabled
but need to be they are already disabled by the caller,
so I left them as they are.

Regards
Patrick

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Patrick McHardy Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Herbert Xu Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Patrick McHardy <= Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Herbert Xu Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Herbert Xu Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	[PATCH] network configs: disconnect network options from drivers, Randy.Dunlap
Next by Date:	Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Herbert Xu
Previous by Thread:	Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Herbert Xu
Next by Thread:	Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Herbert Xu
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]