| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: take 2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 03 Apr 2005 22:39:56 -0400 |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050404022601.GA17293@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <1112358278.1096.160.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050401123554.GA3468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112403845.1088.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050402012813.GA24575@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112406164.1088.54.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050402014619.GB24861@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112469601.1088.173.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112538718.1096.394.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050404005805.GA16543@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112579761.1096.412.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050404022601.GA17293@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 22:26, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 09:56:01PM -0400, jamal wrote: > > I dont think we should broadcast out keys. > > I think that decision should be made by the KM. So you wouldn't do it > for PFKEY, but netlink should definitely do it. > Is it possible to have non-root privileged pfkey sockets. If yes, then it makes sense. > Yes unless you're using elvis :) Elvis left the building a while back ;-> But sightings of him in some doughnought shops in a small town not far from here are rampant ;-> > The code above is in pfkey_spdget(). > How did i miss that? ;-> cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: take 2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: take 2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: take 2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: take 2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |