| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire() |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:57:08 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050403074337.GA8083@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1DHdsP-0003Lr-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424E641A.1020609@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16974.41648.568927.54429@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050402193224.GA25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050402115528.11f71a3c.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050403074337.GA8083@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Herbert Xu writes:
> We could also move rt_cache_flush into a kernel thread. When the
> number of chains is large this function is really expensive for a
> softirq handler.
It can also be done via /proc and left to administrators to find
suitable policy. Kernel just provides the mechanism to rehash.
--ro
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem using HTB, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |