| To: | "open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics |
| From: | Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:08:37 -0800 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, andrea@xxxxxxx, michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050328223203.GC28983@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050324215922.GT14202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424346FE.20704@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20050324233921.GZ14202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050325034341.GV32638@xxxxxxxxx> <20050327035149.GD4053@xxxxxxxxx> <20050327054831.GA15453@xxxxxxxxx> <1111905181.4753.15.camel@mylaptop> <20050326224621.61f6d917.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52vf7bwo4w.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1112042936.5088.22.camel@beastie> <20050328223203.GC28983@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 17:32 -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:48:56PM -0800, Dmitry Yusupov wrote: > > If you have plans to start new project such as SoftRDMA than yes. lets > > discuss it since set of problems will be similar to what we've got with > > software iSCSI Initiators. > > I'm somewhat interested in seeing a SoftRDMA project get off the ground. > At least the NatSemi 83820 gige MAC is able to provide early-rx interrupts > that allow one to get an rx interrupt before the full payload has arrived > making it possible to write out a new rx descriptor to place the payload > wherever it is ultimately desired. It would be fun to work on if not the > most performant RDMA implementation. I see a lot of skepticism around early-rx interrupt schema. It might work for gige, but i'm not sure if it will fit into 10g. What RDMA gives us is zero-copy on receive and new networking api which has a potential to be HW accelerated. SoftRDMA will never avoid copying on receive. But benefit for SoftRDMA would be its availability on client sides. It is free and it could be easily deployed. Soon Intel & Co will give us 2,4,8... multi-core CPUs for around 200$ :), So, who cares if one of those cores will do receive side copying? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] skb pcount with MTU discovery, John Heffner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux support for RDMA (was: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics), Matthew Wilcox |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Generic HDLC update, Krzysztof Halasa |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Ming Zhang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |