netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire
From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:00:19 +0400
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, psec-tools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ms2.inr.ac.ru; b=B8c1/dbp/mKlnqQmR1uEiCDuXy7JrqjD3TOaLRO6GavyKIR5pkkfrtTkqwrL2rqtDeKJl2ixtsTFnEwsjwFigj4zaLU4CR6XietT3qfLyqFjhM4vvihNur9oHqnMiVZdxEMSzE2amGZimpXr59CxLROBlINBibpA7S6BSMOpbq8=;
In-reply-to: <1112405144.1096.33.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1112405144.1096.33.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Hello!

> a) -ERESTART is the correct signal to return

Right behaviour is to behave like ARP. A few of packets are queued,
no errors (until timeout), no blocking.

Alexey

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>