netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why skbuff.h different for 2.4 and 2.6 kernels?

To: linux lover <linux_lover2004@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why skbuff.h different for 2.4 and 2.6 kernels?
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:56:35 -0300
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=jTfgUOXBfv2iTH5LRFl9ty+zHWVysRQGpkUo3vxYR3U06y6/N7w6rUU5EiNXMpnpmJwTdLOiUcKWLGdIfCHJ5KrFiU4X0DJrua7f6HdCfSx8VyL9IGuM5QtuSWAlhW0fHkyVp/FVMt/qD3I7f03FsqhqFnPMkIbe8//gAMk9JoM=
In-reply-to: <20050412012614.69495.qmail@web52209.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20050412012614.69495.qmail@web52209.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 11, 2005 10:26 PM, linux lover <linux_lover2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>         Thanks for reply. Can you please tell me about
> my second question?
>       2)But Why header structures for ipcomp, eh,
> esp(IPSEC) not included in skbuff.h?

I thought I have answered this, the reason to have the layer pointers in skb
be void is that skb is core/generic infrastructure, it should not have any kind
of protocol specific structures/information in it.

- Arnaldo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>