[Top] [All Lists]


To: Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NETLINK_UESTABLISHED notifier event
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 05:36:35 +1000
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1113062579.3893.110.camel@beastie>
References: <> <1112823442.16753.68.camel@beastie> <> <1112826385.16753.99.camel@beastie> <> <1112917001.3893.77.camel@beastie> <> <1112974214.17165.8.camel@mylaptop> <> <1113062579.3893.110.camel@beastie>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:02:59AM -0700, Dmitry Yusupov wrote:
> "emergency pool" is a big and generic feature, needs design and
> resolution. it could definitely wait. Do you have something against
> one liner patch for using sk->sk_allocation instead of hard-coded vm
> priority?

Whatever we come up with will need to be maintained as part of
the kernel ABI.  So I'd rather not see a temporary hack carried
around forever.

You can always patch your kernels to do whatever you want of course.

Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>