[Top] [All Lists]

Re: take 2-2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events

To: Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: take 2-2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 05 Apr 2005 06:18:22 -0400
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1112406164.1088.54.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112469601.1088.173.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1112538718.1096.394.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112614706.1096.439.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112619096.1088.473.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112620614.1088.489.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112653217.1088.2.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112654575.1089.17.camel@jzny.localdomain> <>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 03:35, Masahide NAKAMURA wrote:
> Hello Jamal,
> I've tested normal cases below with the latest patch and it works fine.
> I think you can go ahead.
> tested cases:
>   o netlink (using iproute2 "ip xfrm monitor" to confirm it)
>     - add/del/flush/expire for SA/SP
>     - acquire,allocspi,update for SA
>     - update for SP
>   o pfkey
>     - running racoon
>   o both sockets
>     - running racoon with using "ip xfrm monitor".

Thanks a lot Masahide! 

Ok, heres the patch i will shoot to Dave if no further comments.


Attachment: ipsec-event-take2-5
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>