[Top] [All Lists]

Re: take 2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: take 2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 03 Apr 2005 22:34:04 -0400
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1112353398.1096.116.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112358278.1096.160.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112403845.1088.14.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112406164.1088.54.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112469601.1088.173.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1112538718.1096.394.camel@jzny.localdomain> <>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 20:58, Herbert Xu wrote:
> ;
> > +   // XXX:do we have to pass proto as well?
> I think so.  A flush of all IPCOMP states is certainly quite different
> from a flush of all states.  It's just a matter of calling satype2proto.

I think you meant pfkey_proto2satype(). i.e 
hdr->sadb_msg_satype = pfkey_proto2satype(c->data);

BTW, slightly different from the way netlink does bussiness.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>