Re: [IPSEC] Make IPCOMP more resilient

netdev

Re: [IPSEC] Make IPCOMP more resilient

To:	James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [IPSEC] Make IPCOMP more resilient
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:30:18 -0800
Cc:	herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Xine.LNX.4.44.0503252337500.24726-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20050326035853.GA25162@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xine.LNX.4.44.0503252337500.24726-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:38:12 -0500 (EST)
James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Herbert Xu wrote:
> 
> > In other words, we can let outbound IPCOMP always succeed.  In the cases
> > where it would currently fail we simply skip the IPCOMP transform.  This
> > makes IPCOMP slightly more resilient when memory is low and simplifies
> > the code quite a bit.
> 
> Good idea.
> 
> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[IPSEC] Make IPCOMP more resilient, Herbert Xu Re: [IPSEC] Make IPCOMP more resilient, James Morris Re: [IPSEC] Make IPCOMP more resilient, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] Remove i_sock, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	Re: [IPSEC] Make IPCOMP more resilient, James Morris
Next by Thread:	How to route a skb to a particular oif, when the fib_lookup suggests another one., Devesh Agrawal
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]