netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Checking SPI in xfrm_state_find

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Checking SPI in xfrm_state_find
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:23:25 -0800
Cc: kaber@xxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050331004658.GA26395@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050214221006.GA18415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221200.GA18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221433.GB18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221607.GC18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424864CE.5060802@xxxxxxxxx> <20050328233917.GB15369@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424B40C2.90304@xxxxxxxxx> <20050331004658.GA26395@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:46:58 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
> > #
> > # ChangeSet
> > #   2005/03/30 06:02:45+02:00 kaber@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > #   [IPSEC]: Check SPI in xfrm_state_find()
> > #   
> > #   Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To me too, both patches applied, thanks Patrick.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>