| To: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [IPV4]: Exclude "All deletion of equal addresses only differing by prefix length." |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:26:19 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503312047110.26294@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050331124747.GT3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503312047110.26294@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Pekka Savola <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503312047110.26294@xxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-31 20:48 > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Thomas Graf wrote: > >The address deletion fix is no longer needed since a better fix > >has made it into iproute2. Better in terms of same hack but in > >userspace so we don't confuse other netlink users. > > So, does that mean that all the users are expected to always run the > latest iproute2, so there's no need for backward-compat in the kernel? The actual challenge in this rather trivial problem is that many scripts rely on this wrong behaviour by doing ip a a 1.1.1.1/24 dev lo; ip a d 1.1.1.1 dev lo; and nobody wants to break them. So even with the kernel fix we had, old iproute2 versions still did it wrong but it gave newer iproute2 versions a chance to work around the issue. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] network configs: disconnect network options from drivers, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] network configs: disconnect network options from drivers, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [IPV4]: Exclude "All deletion of equal addresses only differing by prefix length.", Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [IPV4]: Exclude "All deletion of equal addresses only differing by prefix length.", David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |