| To: | Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:44:33 -0500 |
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050329212543.GA432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200503290533.j2T5XEYT028850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4248FBFD.5000809@xxxxxxxxx> <20050328230830.5e90396f.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050329071002.GA16204@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050329152057.GA27840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4249B52C.2000300@xxxxxxxxx> <20050329212543.GA432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 |
Jörn Engel wrote: On Tue, 29 March 2005 15:06:04 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:Jörn Engel wrote:Just out of curiosity: why are there two mailing lists? Especially if one of them is the Wrong One.<shrug>linux-net is mostly dead. I get the impression it is occasionally used by users.netdev (as, perhaps, the name implies) is where the network developers hang out.Ok, I figured as much. But then, why is linux-net not just deleted? Bouncing mails would be an indication that noone will read them, right? <shrug> It doesn't matter that much to me. If you want to undertake the removal of linux-net as your personal mission, I won't stop you :)
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Bridge] [PATCH] bridge hub_enabled option, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Jörn Engel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Jörn Engel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |