Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics

[Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>]

jamal wrote:
> I didnt quiet follow the discussion - Let me see if i can phrase the
> problem correctly (Trying to speak in general terms):
>
> Sender is holding onto memory (retransmit queue i assume) waiting
> for ACKs. Said sender is under OOM and therefore drops ACKs coming in
> and as a result cant let go of these precious resource sitting on the
> retransmit queue. 
> And iscsi cant wait long enough for someone else to release memory so
> the ACKs can be delivered. 
> Did i capture this correctly?
> If yes, the solution maybe to just drop all non-high-prio packets coming
> in during the denial of service attack (for lack of better term). In
> other words some strict prioritization scheduling (or rate control) at
> the network level either in the NIC or ingress qdisc level.
Eventually the TCP will hit its RTX limit and punt the connection, freeing the 
buffers kept for retransmission right?
> On a slightly related topic: is SCSI (not iscsi) considered a reliable
> protocol?
> If yes, why would you wanna run a reliable protocol inside another
> reliable protocol (TCP)?
Isn't it better to consider TCP a protocol that provides reliable notice of 
(presumed) failure rather than a "reliable protocol?"
rick jones