netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Mar 2005 14:28:49 -0500
Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050328155523.GD3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503272249040.5086@xxxxxxxxxx> <1111972035.1091.946.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503281017060.21333@xxxxxxxxxx> <1112012657.1089.1013.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050328123801.GY3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112014261.1089.1018.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050328125802.GZ3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112015725.1089.1045.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050328155523.GD3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 10:55, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * jamal <1112015725.1089.1045.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-28 08:15
> > On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 07:58, Thomas Graf wrote:

> > But you cant completely do this for u32 tcf_exts_dump_stats.
> > in the case of ACTION compiled in but someone using old API.
> > The code that Meelis just mention that compiler complained about. 
> > There was no problem with u32 and tcf_exts_dump - with that you can hide
> > all #ifedfs. 
> 
> I think we can avoid your fixes. 

You are still missing the question;->

You can do this for every classifier but u32. Or is it me who is missing
something?

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>