| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 28 Mar 2005 08:15:25 -0500 |
| Cc: | Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050328125802.GZ3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503272249040.5086@xxxxxxxxxx> <1111972035.1091.946.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503281017060.21333@xxxxxxxxxx> <1112012657.1089.1013.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050328123801.GY3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112014261.1089.1018.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050328125802.GZ3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 07:58, Thomas Graf wrote: > Not sure what you mean, I don't want any ifdefs or actions bits > in the classifiers itself anymore. Everytime we dump the actions > we must be able to also dump the statistics so I think we can > safely move tcf_exts_dump_stats into tcf_exts_dump and hide all > dumping in that single API. > But you cant completely do this for u32 tcf_exts_dump_stats. in the case of ACTION compiled in but someone using old API. The code that Meelis just mention that compiler complained about. There was no problem with u32 and tcf_exts_dump - with that you can hide all #ifedfs. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: register_dev, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPSEC] Too many SADs!, Stephen Frost |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |