Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree

[Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>]

* jamal <1112014261.1089.1018.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-28 07:51
> On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 07:38, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > * jamal <1112012657.1089.1013.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-28 07:24
> > > If we are going to make u32 an exception then this code should be
> > > surrounded by #ifdef ..ACTION..
> > 
> > The same condition is needed for tcf_exts_dump 
> 
> This one seems fine even for u32, no?

Not sure what you mean, I don't want any ifdefs or actions bits
in the classifiers itself anymore. Everytime we dump the actions
we must be able to also dump the statistics so I think we can
safely move tcf_exts_dump_stats into tcf_exts_dump and hide all
dumping in that single API.