| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 28 Mar 2005 07:51:01 -0500 |
| Cc: | Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050328123801.GY3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503272249040.5086@xxxxxxxxxx> <1111972035.1091.946.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503281017060.21333@xxxxxxxxxx> <1112012657.1089.1013.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050328123801.GY3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 07:38, Thomas Graf wrote: > * jamal <1112012657.1089.1013.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-28 07:24 > > If we are going to make u32 an exception then this code should be > > surrounded by #ifdef ..ACTION.. > > The same condition is needed for tcf_exts_dump This one seems fine even for u32, no? cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |