| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 26 Mar 2005 15:06:25 -0500 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shinta.sugimoto@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050326194503.GA9826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <E1DF15m-0006JT-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111862486.1090.880.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050326194217.GA9778@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050326194503.GA9826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 14:45, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 05:42:17AM +1000, herbert wrote: > > > > It's only sitting there forever because ping is configured to send > > packets forever by default. > > > > Try ping -c 1 and things will probably be different. > > Actually it won't. It will try it forever when the larval state > expires. When we fix the xfrm state resolution, we can add a > knob for this case. When you get that and need someone to test just post it and i will. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Resend: Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |