| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:47:07 +1000 |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1111864971.1092.904.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1111864971.1092.904.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:22:51PM -0500, jamal wrote: > > --- a/include/linux/xfrm.h 2005/03/26 18:30:26 1.1 > +++ b/include/linux/xfrm.h 2005/03/26 18:47:48 > @@ -254,5 +254,8 @@ > > #define XFRMGRP_ACQUIRE 1 > #define XFRMGRP_EXPIRE 2 > +#define XFRMGRP_POLEXPIRE 4 > +#define XFRMGRP_SA 8 > +#define XFRMGRP_POLICY 0x10 Since we're adding new multicast groups, what about adding one for the passive event monitor? That way we can return ESRCH in km_query if there are no registered ACQUIRE listeners but still send messages to the monitor. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |