netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:01:02 +0100
Cc: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1111783686.1089.661.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1111625608.1037.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424212F7.10106@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111663947.1037.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111665450.1037.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4242DFB5.9040802@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111749220.1092.457.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42446DB2.9070809@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111781443.1092.631.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050325202014.GE3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111783686.1089.661.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
* jamal <1111783686.1089.661.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-25 15:48
> On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 15:20, Thomas Graf wrote:
> 
> > 7/10 because the meta ematch could make great use of this. Matching
> > on netfilter meta data is in my local tree but I guess I won't
> > have time to test everything in the next 2 weeks so it will probably
> > be too late for 2.6.12.
> 
> /me looks at Thomas ;-> Could you be convinced to do this so i can play
> with my ipsec toy? ;->

I can enqueue it to the following working queue, won't be dequeued
for quite a while though.
 resolve an open htb+gred issue
 libqsearch thing + ematch
 push meta ematch changes
 libnl + netconfig release

If you want to see results soon, look for someone else. ;->

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>