jamal wrote: On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 15:39, Patrick McHardy wrote:Thinking again, is it really necessary? Please look at the problem and patch Phil Oester just posted, I would prefer if we could keep conntrack out of areas with queues :)But it is already there ;-> Recall you are already end up in the qdisc queues today ;-> I asked Phil to send a new patch which drops the reference when the packet leaves IP. We can't make assumptions about the packets fate after that, and the problem with hanging conntrack unload really should get fixed once and for all. Regards Patrick |
| Previous by Date: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, Patrick McHardy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |