| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:20:14 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1111781443.1092.631.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4241F1D2.9050202@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4241F7F0.2010403@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111625608.1037.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424212F7.10106@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111663947.1037.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111665450.1037.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4242DFB5.9040802@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111749220.1092.457.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42446DB2.9070809@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111781443.1092.631.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* jamal <1111781443.1092.631.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-25 15:10 > Things will work once the "action track" is in place; i.e you would > then say: > "match xxx .. \ > action track \ > action connmark" > > If i was to prioritize my time for new actions - how important is this? 7/10 because the meta ematch could make great use of this. Matching on netfilter meta data is in my local tree but I guess I won't have time to test everything in the next 2 weeks so it will probably be too late for 2.6.12. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: action stats double dip, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |